It was reported that Starlink, Elon Musk’s satellite internet service, increased its subscription rates in Nigeria by 97% without approval from the Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC). This move ignited controversy, leading to the NCC’s announcement to enforce regulatory actions against the company.
But can the NCC effectively sanction Starlink? The answer lies in the Nigerian Communications Act (NCA) of 2003, which grants the NCC significant authority over the telecom sector.
The legal framework
The NCC’s regulatory authority stems from Sections 108 and 111 of the Nigerian Communications Act 2003. These provisions make it mandatory for telecom operators to seek and obtain tariff approvals from the NCC before altering any fees for their services.
Section 108 explicitly prohibits licensees from imposing charges for any service without prior approval, while Section 111 allows the Commission to impose financial penalties on companies that breach this rule.
Since Starlink did not receive approval for its price increase, it violated these provisions. So, the NCC is empowered to levy fines or enforce other penalties against the company, underscoring its regulatory oversight over both local and international telecom operators within Nigerian jurisdiction.
The NCC’s response
While this took a while, the NCC, through the Director of Public Affairs, Dr Reuben Muoka said:
The decision by Starlink to unilaterally review their subscription packages upwards, did not receive the approval of the Nigerian Communications Commission. The action of the company is in contravention of Sections 108 and 111 of the Nigerian Communications Act, 2003, and Starlink’s License Conditions regarding tariffs. The Commission commenced pre-enforcement action on the licensee on the 3rd of October, 2024.
The key insight here is that by acting without approval, Starlink risks more than just financial penalties; it could face restrictions or disruptions in its Nigerian operations if the NCC determines that the violation compromises market fairness.
Global context
While Starlink is a global satellite service with operations in many countries, its compliance with local regulatory frameworks is crucial.
In countries like Nigeria, where telecom regulations are tightly controlled, non-compliance can lead to significant operational challenges.
Potential implications
If the NCC successfully imposes sanctions, it could set a precedent for other countries where Starlink operates. On the other hand, if Starlink negotiates with the NCC or reaches a settlement, it could avert harsher penalties but might be forced to adjust its pricing strategy in line with local expectations.
The real deal is that yes, the NCC can sanction Starlink under Nigerian law, and it appears determined to do so. The outcome of this regulatory conflict will likely shape the future of satellite internet services in Nigeria and could influence how Starlink and similar global tech companies navigate national regulations in other markets.
What’s not the real deal?
Earlier, Nigeria’s Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) concluded a three-year investigation into Meta’s WhatsApp, accusing it of multiple violations of Nigerian data privacy laws.
The investigation, jointly conducted with the Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC), found that WhatsApp had been engaging in “discriminatory” practices against Nigerian users.
These included unauthorised data sharing, denial of user consent rights, and transferring data to third parties without proper authorisation.
WhatsApp’s privacy policies were deemed unfair, particularly when compared to standards in other regions like the EU, where users have greater protections under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
As a result, the FCCPC imposed a $220 million (₦330 billion) fine on Meta, ordering the company to change its practices to comply with Nigerian laws.
Despite this, WhatsApp has appealed the fine, arguing that the FCCPC’s directives are vague and legally unfounded. Meta also stated that implementing the required changes would be operationally challenging. The company claims it has already introduced updates giving Nigerian users more control over their data and is contesting the penalty calculation and procedural handling of the investigation.
The FCCPC, however, remains steadfast, dismissing WhatsApp’s threats of withdrawing from the Nigerian market as a strategic manoeuvre aimed at swaying public opinion and avoiding compliance. The legal battle continues, with Meta’s appeal still pending.
So, no $220 million for Nigeria?
The post Can the NCC sanction Starlink over its “unapproved” 97% price increase? first appeared on Technext.